Interesting Facts

• Teman is identified as one of the sons of Korah.
• Korah was a son of Esau.
• Teman is listed as a “duke that came of Esau“.
• His name appears in a list of dukes according to their families and places.
• Teman is mentioned alongside Mibzar, Magdiel, and Eram as sons of Korah, indicating a sibling relationship within a significant Edomite lineage.

Genealogy

• Teman was a son of Korah.
• Korah was a son of Esau.
• Esau is identified as the father of the Edomites.
• The sources do not provide information regarding Teman’s birth, marital connections, or offspring.

Historical Context

The appearance of Teman in the genealogical records as a son of Korah, who was himself a son of Esau, situates him within the early history and formation of the Edomite people. His designation as a “duke” is a crucial detail, signifying a recognized position of leadership and authority within the developing tribal structure of the Edomites in the land of Seir. The emergence of these dukedoms reflects a societal organization based on familial descent and the establishment of influential lineages stemming from Esau. While the specific historical events and cultural dynamics of Teman’s era are not detailed beyond his inclusion in these lists, his presence among the dukes suggests his involvement in the early governance and social hierarchy of the Edomite confederacy. This period likely involved the establishment of territorial claims and the consolidation of power among the various families descended from Esau.

Narrative

The narrative surrounding Teman within these texts is primarily genealogical, serving to establish his lineage and his position within the broader Edomite ancestry. As a son of Korah and a grandson of Esau, Teman holds a specific place within this foundational narrative. His designation as a duke implies that he was a figure who wielded some level of authority or influence within his family or a larger tribal division, contributing to the overall social and political organization of the early Edomite community. While the sources do not recount specific actions, pronouncements, or personal interactions of Teman, his inclusion in the list of dukes underscores the development of a structured leadership within the Edomite nation, with individuals like Teman playing a role in the establishment of governance and the definition of familial power structures. Thus, Teman’s narrative contribution, as presented in these sources, is that of an ancestral leader whose ducal status signifies his role in the early history and organization of the Edomites.